The Peer Perception Index analyzes where top researchers actually publish, providing a transparent metric for journal/conference quality beyond traditional impact factors.
Try searching: "Nature", "IEEE 0018-9375", or "computer science"
A quality-centric framework for researchers, academics, and institutions to evaluate the true prestige of journals and conferences beyond traditional metrics.
Access a comprehensive directory of 0+ journals/conferences with detailed PPI and metrics.
Understand journal/conference prestige through data-driven analysis of first author affiliations and rankings.
Explore global distribution of first authors and identify regional publication patterns.
Filter journals/conferences by PPI category to distinguish high-quality from low-quality publications.
PPI analyzes where researchers from top-tier institutions choose to publish, revealing true academic prestige beyond citation counts.
Collect First Author Data
Weight by Prestige
Calculate Index
Categorize Journals / Conferences
PPI analyzes where researchers from top-tier institutions choose to publish, revealing true academic prestige beyond citation counts.
Journals and conferences are classified into five tiers based on their PPI, reflecting prestige and quality among academic peers.
Most prestigious journals/conferences where top universities and organizations frequently publish.
Well-regarded journals/conferences with strong participation from high-ranking institutions.
Low-quality journals/conferences with moderate participation from recognized institutions.
Borderline predatory journals/conferences with negative perception among academic peers.
Journals/conferences with extremely negative reputation, not assigned a quality category.